News   |   Sign Up   |   A LEVER FOR SCALE

50-State Early Childhood Policy Progress and Landscape Report

The Year’s Developments and Trends in State Early Childhood Policy and Advocacy

 

Progress, Pivots, and Power: State Advocates Make Gains on Changing Policy Landscapes

Dear Early Childhood Policy Allies,

Support for state early childhood policies and funding continued to be strong in 2024, with policymakers from every region and political landscape acting to improve their early childhood policies. In our annual survey of state early childhood advocates, all states with a legislative session reported a policy win, and 83 percent reported a win that included an increase in state funding. Many legislatures appropriated state funds to close federal funding gaps, signaling the importance of investing in the early years as a public good, worthy of state general revenues. Half of the states also reported defeating a bill that would have been harmful to children, demonstrating that advocates play both offense and defense in state capitals.

Read on for a sampling of what happened, or check out our state policy landscape profiles for a deep dive on each state’s early childhood policy landscape.

As we look to the upcoming legislative sessions in 2025, survey results show that many policymakers—governors, state legislators, and state agency administrators—are supportive of improving early childhood policies, making the climate ripe for additional wins. State budgets are well-positioned to support increased investments, if policymakers choose to make them. The fall 2024 report of the National Association of State Budget Officers shows 31 states are projecting general revenue fund spending increases, and rainy-day funds continue to grow.

While political power shifted in the White House and the U.S. Congress, partisan control held steady at the state level. Republicans maintained 23 trifectas—majorities in the House, Senate, and Governor’s office—while Democrats held on to trifectas in 15 states, but lost trifectas in two states, with Republicans taking control of the Michigan House and a tie in the Minnesota Senate. This is the least amount of change in partisan power at the state level since 1992,* but advocates will still be busy educating newly elected lawmakers about early childhood systems and policies.

The states’ political stability and favorable fiscal climates mean that possibilities abound in the coming year for young children and families.

While the political battles in Washington, DC, will get media attention in 2025, don’t forget the states. State policymakers and state advocates will continue the drumbeat, building momentum across the country for better policies that give young children and families what they need to succeed.

Looking Forward, 

Helene Stebbins, Executive Director
Alliance for Early Success

 

*Ballotpedia, Election Results, 2024: State Government Trifectas

Alliance for Early Success state grantees shared legislative highlights from 2024, and the results show wins in states of all different sizes, regions, and political landscapes—showcasing the effectiveness of tailoring advocacy to conditions on the ground and nurturing powerful coalitions.

In the face of increasingly polarized political environments and the depletion of federal pandemic relief funding, state advocates and policymakers stepped up. They worked to get good policies over the finish line and successfully implemented, as well as to defeat bills that were harmful to children. This report summarizes responses from our annual survey of state policy advocates in all 50 states and the District of Columbia (n=51). What did we learn? 

Every state with a legislative session and the District of Columbia reported a policy win. 

In 2024, 46 states and the District of Columbia held legislative sessions, and 100 percent of them reported a policy win. A policy win includes passage of a bill, approval of an executive order or administrative change, changing of rules by a state agency, or a ballot initiative or constitutional amendment.

Child care policy wins continue to dominate state policy agendas, with momentum from the pandemic and the expiration of federal relief funds fueling this policy area. Among all states and DC, 88 percent of states (n=45) highlighted a win in early care and education (ECE), with 72 percent reporting a win in child care. Fifty-three percent (n=27) highlighted a win in maternal and child health, 43 percent (n=22) highlighted a win in family economic security and supports, and 10 percent (n=5) highlighted a win in state infrastructure (such as a state agency reorganizations or new data systems). 

For highlights by policy area, select The Policy Year in Review tab to the left. Full responses appear in detail on the state policy landscape profiles. 

Among the states with a legislative session and DC, 81 percent (n=38) reported a win that includes an increase in their state’s budget. 

Most of the funding for early childhood programs comes from federal funding streams, but increasingly, state policymakers are dedicating state general revenues for early childhood programs. Many legislatures appropriated state funds to close federal funding gaps, signaling the importance of investing in the early years as a public good, worthy of state general revenues. 

Half of the states reported defeating a bill that would have been harmful.

Not all policies are good, and state early childhood advocates devoted significant time, effort, and political capital to protecting children, families, or early childhood practitioners from policies they considered harmful. In fact, in half of the states (n=26), allies reported they worked to prevent or minimize budget cuts and tax policies that would hurt children and families, protect against rollbacks to Medicaid expansion, and block or improve bills aimed at lowering quality standards or restricting eligibility for supports and services.

In the District of Columbia, the mayor proposed a complete elimination of the recently created first-in-the-nation Early Childhood Educator Pay Equity Fund. In Louisiana, state lawmakers proposed cutting $24 million from the $87 million it had passed for child care subsidies the previous year. In both states, advocates won a restoration of most of the funding—but not all. 

35 states and DC reported they shaped or influenced the implementation of previously passed legislation or a rule change.   

While many of these wins entailed passing a new bill, state advocates also fight for the implementation of previously passed policies. Legislation rarely includes the details necessary for successful implementation, so advocacy moves into state agencies as rules and regulation take shape and funding is adequately appropriated.  

Sometimes this implementation is positive, such as in Minnesota, where state policymakers added advance periodic payments, so funds from the new child tax credit (CTC) arrived in families’ pockets earlier in the year.  

But often, advocates play defense during implementation, ensuring the bill delivers on its promise. In Vermont, for example, advocates were still celebrating a first-in-the-nation expansive child care win when the governor proposed cuts to the program. Advocacy paid off with a restoration of funding and new, stronger language in the legislation, effectively making the subsidy program an entitlement. 

The political and fiscal climate for progress remains strong, with advocates indicating the majority of policymakers are supportive of improving early childhood policies.  

Advocates are making year-over-year progress educating and influencing state legislators on early childhood issues. Approximately 65 percent of states report a legislature that is supportive of early childhood issues—an 11-percent increase over two years ago. The survey suggests the opposite among governors, where support has declined since 2022. 

Percentage of States Reporting Policymakers as Supportive or Very Supportive of Early Childhood Issues 

The November 2024 elections kept political power essentially unchanged at the state level. Republicans maintained 23 trifectas –majorities in the House, Senate, and Governor’s office – while Democrats held on to trifectas in 15 states, but political power shifted in two states with Republicans taking control of the Michigan House and a tie in the Minnesota Senate. The two trifecta shift is the least amount of change in political power at the state level since 1992.*

The fall 2024 report of the National Association of State Budget Officers shows 31 states are projecting general revenue fund spending increases, and rainy-day funds continue to grow.  

What this all means is that progress will continue with the favorable political and fiscal climate in states. 

*Ballotpedia, Election Results, 2024: State Government Trifectas

Alliance state grantees shared highlights from the year in the broad areas of maternal and child health, early care and education, and family supports. Whether it was a new policy passed, an increase in funding, or an improvement to an existing policy, these shifts will improve lives for young children and their families.

Percentage of States Highlighting a Win, by Issue Area


In the annual review of early childhood policy and progress in states, the District of Columbia is counted as a states (n-51). 

Maternal and Child Health

Advocates reported a policy win in 27 states, and 18 states increased the state budget for maternal and child health.

Several states increased access to early intervention and special education services.

    • GeorgiaRhode Island, and Minnesota increased reimbursement rates for certain early intervention providers.

    • Texas advocates collaborated with state officials to include “developmental delay” as an eligibility category for special education services, a policy modeled after other states. Definition and governance changes also increased eligibility for and access to early intervention and mental health supports in New HampshireMaine, and Washington.

    • Maine passed significant changes for responsibility and oversight of the educational services for young children with disabilities.

More states adopted continuous coverage for Medicaid in the early years.  

    • CaliforniaNew York, and Pennsylvania, followed their peers in extending continuous Medicaid coverage during the early childhood years, ensuring access to health care without interruptions due to administrative burdens. While the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act requires all states to provide 12 months of continuous health coverage for children in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), a growing number of state legislatures have approved continuous enrollment for multiple years. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has approved waivers to allow multi-year continuous coverage for nine states, while three additional states have legislative approval but have not yet submitted a waiver.

Prenatal care improved.

With the addition of DelawareVirginia, and Vermont, a total of 27 states plus Washington, DC, have already implemented—or are in the process of implementing—Medicaid coverage for doula care. To support states in implementing doula coverage through Medicaid, Alliance partner Elephant Circle offered a webinar on the topic in March 2024. 

MassachusettsColorado, and Illinois passed bills that will increase access to midwifery care, a model that monitors the physical, psychological, and social well-being of mothers and pregnant people throughout the childbearing cycle, resulting in fewer interventions and positive impacts on health outcomes in the United States if adopted more broadly.

    • Michigan allies are advancing permanent policy solutions to address maternal health equity. Perinatal Quality Collaboratives, designed to improve outcomes for families during preconception, birth, and postpartum, are now established by statute, blood pressure monitors must be covered by Medicaid and private insurance for pregnant/postpartum patients, and mental health screenings for new mothers are required as part of postpartum obstetrics or pediatric appointments, among more than nine maternal health bills passed in 2024.
    • Minnesota passed a grant program targeted specifically at increasing access to culturally congruent care for Black and Indigenous families.

States increased access to home visiting supports.

Several states expanded evidence-based home visiting, a practice that has a demonstrable positive impact on the health of mothers and newborns.

    • $1 million to expand the rural home-visiting pilot in Georgia.
    • $3.72 million in new funding for home visiting programs in Michigan, including a $3.3 million increase for the state’s Maternal Infant Health Program and $420,000 in one-time funding for the Nurse Family Partnership program.
    • Ohio piloted a new universal nurse home visiting program with the goal of serving 4,000 families.
    • $2.5 million appropriation in Arizona for the nurse-family partnership programs to become non-lapsing through FY 2027.
    • Nebraska dedicated $1.4 million from the Medicaid Managed Care Excess Profit Fund to fund community-specific universal nurse home-visiting programs ($500,000) and evidence-based programs eligible for MIECHV matching funds ($900,000.)
    • Oregon fully funded the Nurse Family Partnerships program by $3.2 million as part of the direct investments in prevention programs.
    • Rhode Island enacted a permanent Medicaid rate increase for the First Connections family home visiting program, the first permanent rate increase in 22 years.

Early Care and Education (ECE)

Alliance state grantees reported at least one ECE policy win in 45 states, with 33 states increasing the state budget for early care and education. Below are some highlights from 2024.

Numerous states improved child care access.

As federal pandemic relief funds for child care expired in 2024, early childhood advocates in many states were able to secure state funding to address the gap.  While, in most cases, state funding was not sufficient to replace all the federal funds, these wins demonstrate that governors and state legislators—in both conservative and progressive led states—see improving child care access and quality as an appropriate purpose for state funding.

There were numerous funding increases, and Alliance allies highlighted the following:

    • $12 million in Arizona for the child care subsidy program, the first state investment in nearly 15 years.
    • $23 million in Florida for School Readiness Plus, which allows families up to 100% of the state median income who are enrolled in the child care subsidy program to continue receiving the subsidy. The state also allocated $200 million to align the subsidy rates closer to the cost of care, instead of the market rate.
    • $59 million in Kentucky for their Child Care Assistance Program.
    • More than $10 million in Maine to meet increased demand due to an increase in eligibility for child care subsidies from 85% of the state’s median income to 125% beginning July 1, 2024.
    • $270 million of new state funds in Maryland’s FY25 budget for the Child Care Scholarship Program.
    • $997 million in FY25 for New York’s Child Care Assistance Program, more than doubling the state investment of $459 million for FY24. New York also added $100 million in funding to expand pre-k slots throughout the state, which will create about 8,000 more pre-k seats in the state.
    • More than $170 million in Oregon to address a waitlist for child care that resulted from expansion of eligibility enacted in 2021: $99 million allocated immediately to tackle existing caseload issues, and an additional $72 million designated in a special purpose account (SPA) to potentially reduce the waitlist next year.
    • More than $366 million in FY25 and $461 million in FY26 in Virginia’s general fund to support early care and education. Combined with ongoing federal support, the state will commit more than $1.1 billion over the biennium toward child care services for low to moderate income families.

The early care and education workforce continues to be a priority for state leaders.

State advocates highlighted the following wins from 2024.

    • In 2022, Kentucky passed a policy to extend subsidy eligibility to child care teachers and staff, regardless of income. Since 2022, early childhood advocates and policymakers in many states have advanced this idea as a way to attract and retain early childhood educators. Even though the strategy doesn’t directly increase educators’ compensation, it does provide them with some financial relief. In 2024, states including ArkansasIndianaMaineNebraskaNew HampshireUtah, and Washington, DC implemented this strategy or passed policies to enact it. Others, including IowaRhode IslandWashington State, and of course, Kentucky continued to allocate funding for it. In Kentucky, the state is providing more than $26 million to provide this benefit to child care staff.
    • Illinois increased funding for its Smart Start Workforce Grants by 27 percent to $158.5 million.
    • Colorado created a new $1200 tax credit specifically for care workers, estimated to impact more than 35,000 licensed child care workers, Family, Friend, and Neighbor (FFN) child care workers, and qualifying personal care aides and home care workers.
    • In Georgia, advocates helped secure almost $100 million in additional funding to make critical improvements to Georgia’s Lottery-funded pre-k program that improves working conditions for its educators, including restoring class size to 20 students per class, increasing salaries for lead and assistant teachers, and funding to support classroom costs.

Family Supports

Healthy young children need healthy and economically stable families, and state advocates continued to work on policies related to tax credits, making federal benefits more accessible, guaranteed income pilots, housing, addressing hunger, paid leave programs, and child welfare systems.

Advocates reported a family support policy win in 22 states, and 14 states increased state funding for family support programs.

Family incomes increased due to increased tax credits, including Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs), Child Tax Credits (CTC), and Child and Dependent Care Tax Credits (CDCTC):

    • Illinois established a permanent state CTC for families who are eligible for the federal EITC with children under age 12, and it is expected to impact more than 800,000 households and lift nearly 14,000 children out of poverty.
    • New York added a one-time supplement to their Empire State Child Tax Credit that will impact one million families. one million families.
    • Utah expanded its CTC for families with young children to include 4-year-olds.
    • Colorado created a new tax credit, in addition to their state EITC and CTC—nearly half of Colorado families will benefit from the new Family Affordability Tax Credit, with the highest benefits going to the lowest-income families and with the youngest children.
    • Both Kansas and Wisconsin raised their state Child and Dependent Care Tax Credits (CDCTC) as a percentage of the federal CDCTC—Kansas from 25 percent to 50 percent, and Wisconsin from 50percent to 100 percent of the federal credit. A few other states are seeing tax credits for families as a potential focus for the 2025 session.

A few states used the flexibility of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) to make positive changes.

At least three states passed laws that will better support renters at risk of eviction (who often have young children).

    • Colorado reduced court fees and will collect better data on evictions.
    • Georgia’s new Safe at Home Act requires that rental properties are fit for habitation, prevents cooling from being cut off, prohibits security deposits larger than two months’ rent, gives a tenant time to pay before an eviction proceeding is filed, and puts new requirements on how eviction notices must be delivered to tenants.
    • Idaho passed a law that will allow dismissed eviction filings to be shielded from public viewing after three years as long as no appeal is pending.

In several states, advocates made significant gains in the area of child nutrition.

    • Alabama will fund the Summer Electronic Benefits Program (EBT) in 2025, drawing down a federal match to help feed school-aged children in the summer months.
    • In Missouri, advocates successfully won a reversal on the state’s original decision to decline to participate in Summer EBT.
    • Oregon passed funding to ensure that home-based child care providers can continue to access federal reimbursement for food they serve to children in care.
    • Virginia established a Commission to End Hunger.
    • Kansas advocates defeated a bill that would have required non-custodial parents to cooperate with child support enforcement to receive food assistance.

While eight states improved access to existing Paid Family and Medical Leave Policies—expanding who was eligible and the amount of the benefit—two states took smaller steps toward supporting family leave.

    • Kentucky will make six weeks of paid leave available to Executive Branch state employees who have serious health conditions or are welcoming a new child through birth, adoption, or foster care. The change will impact about 30,000 employees.
    • South Carolina became the eighth state to authorize optional paid family leave insurance products that employers can purchase to cover paid time off for their employees.

Kinship and related family-centered policies help improve child welfare systems in seven states. 

    • Minnesota, Missouri, and Virginia made it easier for relatives to care for children in foster care. Minnesota’s legislation specifically focuses on addressing racism and disparities in the child welfare system. 
    • Family-strengthening bills in Vermont, Oregon, West Virginia, and Idaho focus on empowering families involved in child welfare, helping families access treatment and community-based services, and strengthening rights and protections. Idaho passed two bills, including the creation of a Foster Care Ombudsman, which creates a grievance process for families to assess and address claims of rights violations in foster care, Idaho was one of just seven states with no agency identified to fill an ombudsman role. The Idaho Legislature also passed a bill that adds restrictions on foster placements in unlicensed group care settings.
  •  

Use the map below to see all the progress highlights reported by each state.

Looking forward to the future of investment in and support of state policy advocacy, the Alliance for Early Success sees some clear indicators from the last several years of wins and landscape changes.

Effective advocacy requires stable, flexible funding, and just-in-time access to expertise customized to the state context.   

In 2024, the Alliance passed through $4.5 million to 67 organizations in all 50 states and the District of Columbia as stable, core support grants that allow them to both advance good policy and defend against harmful policy in state government. State allies also had access to 25 national experts who received $2 million in funding to provide customized, responsive support on demand. Core support and expertise on demand allows for both short-term pivots and building long-term momentum. These resources provide a necessary—though not sufficientvoice for the bold vision the Alliance seeks to achieve.  

Stabilizing and growing organizations that represent the voices of families and the early childhood workforce is essential. 

A powerful voice for young children cannot thrive when large segments of the constituency don’t have the capacity to participate meaningfully. Grassroots organizations that represent the voices of families and the early childhood workforce need significant additional resources for their work—and to be able to participate in coalitions. When the Alliance received a $10-million MacKenzie Scott grant, the organization transferred the entire investment to the Early Childhood Power Equity Fund for distribution as multi-year, general operating grants to under-resourced grassroots organizations. The grantees were selected by a collaborative of five organizations catalyzed by the Alliance in 2021 to find ways to build power among those closest to the problems they seek to solve. The Fund will begin dispersing multi-year unrestricted grassroots grants in 2025. 

Effective and authentic coalitions require trust and mindset shift 

The Alliance continues to look for creative, responsive, and trust-based ways to invest in and support organizations that allow them to do the most effective advocacy possible, in any moment, and in any state. It is clear that dynamic, peer-to-peer connections create opportunities to share information in ways that accelerate progress across state lines.

But this process is decidedly organic and depends on advocates making connections and building trusted relationships to allow them to learn from both successes and failures. And building this trust happens most effectively in person, in face-to-face interactions uninterrupted by the daily distractions of the office.  For this reason, the Alliance hosted four meetings in the second half of 2024 that included: 

    1.  The Alabama Experience, a shared journey to Montgomery designed to build racial equity muscle in state organizations, and catalyze new ways of working when they returned home 
    2. A regional meeting of teams from northeastern states who shared their strategies, successes, and failures from working in coalition. 
    3. The Alliance Partners on the ECE Profession gathered in Seattle to learn how advocates from Child Care Aware of Washington (CCA) used the principles of Liberatory Design to “flip the script” by facilitating a multi-year process that puts early childhood educators in leadership and decision-making roles.  
    4. The first-ever Right for Kids convening, a community of practice of states with Republican-controlled legislatures (House and Senate) strengthen relationships to allow for more honest and authentic engagement. One attendee shared, “I feel so much better prepared/comfortable with dialing-in to future virtual convenings of peers now that I have met folks—especially as someone new to the policy space.” 

In polarized politics and term-limited legislatures, we need a powerful and durable voice for young children. 

The hallmark wins in the past several years benefitted from vocal and diverse coalitions united with a clear, common demand. While the “what” of policy advocacy is crucial, it is the “how”—the communities that collaborate, the voices that are lifted up, the steady progress educating legislators about the issues—that makes for the long-term, durable change. The Alliance’s theory of change positions its role of accelerating traditional advocacy in this new direction, building collective power among diverse voices, working toward bold objectives. In the years to come, the Alliance will invest in efforts that build this powerful, durable voice. 

All together, the early childhood state policy progress and developments of 2024 show the effectiveness of investing resources and tailored support in state policy advocacy organizations. 

These organizations have the relationships and deep landscape knowledge necessary to work a long-term strategy, or seize a sudden opportunity, or defeat a policy that would prove harmful. 

And we also saw that investment in capacity is more than a grant. While growing the capacity of these essential voices requires funding, it also requires the long-term commitments, connections, and responsiveness that accelerate their advocacy and—often—make the difference in a win for young children and their families.   

2024 State Policy Landscape Profiles

Select a state to see its 2024 policy landscape and legislative highlights.

About this Report

The Alliance for Early Success’ 50-State Early Childhood Policy Progress and Landscape Report is an analysis of the year in early childhood state policy advocacy that in informed in part by a survey of advocates in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The survey asks them for highlights from the year, so the results, therefore, are representative and not comprehensive.  

Analysis was completed by the Alliance policy team, with special thanks to Frontera Strategy for developing and conducting the 50-state-plus-DC survey.

Mandy Ableidinger, Senior Policy Director
Mimi Aledo-Sandoval, Senior Policy Director
Jacy Montoya Price, Senior Director, Advocacy and Issue Campaigns
Aaliyah Roulhac, Community and Network Associate
Daniela Villasmil, Policy Associate
Albert Wat, Senior Policy Director

Helene Stebbins, Executive Director 

Individual state early childhood policy landscape pages were compiled by Alliance staff from the sources credited on each page.

Frontera Strategy supports advocacy efforts nationwide by providing qualitative and quantitative research services, including needs assessments and environmental scans, program and policy evaluation, statistical analyses, and survey research for associations, foundations, and nonprofit service organizations active in state capitols. 

Jason Sabo
sabo@fronterastrategy.com

Lisa Kerber, PhD
kerber@fronterastrategy.com

Advocates working in all states and the District of Columbia completed the survey, and all 51 are represented in the data. The report was edited by Stinson Liles, Director of Communications, Alliance for Early Success.

The state pages and the report are not meant to be comprehensive. Both feature highlights from the year as reported by Alliance allies in the state. 

Suggested Citation: Alliance for Early Success, 50-State Early Childhood Policy Progress and Landscape Report 2024

Stay Informed, Stay Connected

Sign up for invitations to early childhood policy webinars, state advocacy news, and more.